Move ON
Inspired by the theories of “Change is the only constant” and “Energy flow of love”
For most of you, this title would sound absurd and the whole notion of relating love with energy and constant change might sound stupid. But I have few logical explanations which will definitely make you understand the title and the subtitle.
You might term these as theories leading to another theory which is the final place that I want to take you to. Now I am sure those who have read a little bit or have heard to the gyaan of various people would agree to theory number 1 which says “Change is the only constant of life.”
Fundas for theory 1:
“If you don’t change, time/people/influence will change you in some or the other respect which you might or might not realize at that point of time.”
“If you become rigid and do not allow change to enter the perforated holes in your heart and mind, you might be leading yourself to a situation of brain toxification.”
“If you think that to remain constant is the goal of the human being and one who can do so is the person who can stand erect in great storms, then let me tell you, you are wrong. The only thing that helps you win through any battle or journey is the fact that you are ready to adapt, you are ready to listen to others, analyze the situation and mould (basically change) accordingly. And mind you everyone here is playing to win but in their own senses and their own games.”
Now, let me quickly take you to my next theory which says “Love flows like energy from one heart to another.”
Fundas of Theory 2:
“We are capable of loving more than one person at a time. We love our mom-dad, brother-sisters, uncle-aunts, grandparents and friends.”
“There is no such thing as ‘I no longer love this person.’ Of course you do. If you claim you don’t, it has just 2 meanings, one that you don’t want to accept it anymore and two that claim to hate that person because he/she didn’t paid attention to you or hurt you in the past and you are not ready to get hurt again.”
“Everyone experiences that once you feel strongly about something or someone, you begin to see things/behaviors changing for better, which is because your heart/brain is transmitting positive energy to their hearts/brains which gets reflected in the new attitude for various things or people.”
Now if you combine both the theories, we can deduce that our love keeps growing but changes with time. For ex: we have one best friend in school, another in college, another during job and life moves on. Though we love all our old friends but best/close friends keeps changing with time and sometimes we don’t even realize it.
Similarly with other relations, some of them come close at one point of time and some at other point of time. Basically, love flows like an energy from one heart to another and concentrates at different ends at different times.
Now my question to all the readers is, if change is constant and love is sublime energy flowing from one person to other, why do we want to stick to the concept of “One man woman or vice versa” or why do we want to be tied in the shackles of “I have just loved one person in my life.”
Before you raise a question, I want to clarify that I am not trying to propagate that “don’t be loyal” or “love many at a time.” I truly believe that loyalty in love brings devotion and devotion strengthens your heart making it more capable of giving and accepting.
But what I am trying to say is that when you leave your job, which you loved, you still find a new one. When you leave your friends or a place you loved, you find a new one. So when you are capable of moving on with every other thing in your life, then why not “love”? Why sulk about losing someone or why the whole concept of dipping into depth of pain and atrocity on yourself just because you lost someone. Hey guys, “Move On.”
Every society wants to do that, the whole shift from eastern to western culture is about moving on. It is not about leaving your culture or manners; it is about easing the rules of moving on. When you fight for a widow’s remarriage or when you claim that “sati” is wrong because the wife’s life does not end as soon as the husband’s life ends, then what you are fighting for is basically the right for everyone to “move on.”
And that’s my final theory- “The Move On” theory. It doesn’t asks you to stop loving those whom you did earlier, it doesn’t asks you to go through pain just because situations went against you, it doesn’t asks for your sacrifice or your partner’s sacrifice and last but not the least, it doesn’t asks you to be not loyal or not committed. It just says one thing:
“Be happy, let others be happy and in case you both are not, there’s always an option to Move On.”
For most of you, this title would sound absurd and the whole notion of relating love with energy and constant change might sound stupid. But I have few logical explanations which will definitely make you understand the title and the subtitle.
You might term these as theories leading to another theory which is the final place that I want to take you to. Now I am sure those who have read a little bit or have heard to the gyaan of various people would agree to theory number 1 which says “Change is the only constant of life.”
Fundas for theory 1:
“If you don’t change, time/people/influence will change you in some or the other respect which you might or might not realize at that point of time.”
“If you become rigid and do not allow change to enter the perforated holes in your heart and mind, you might be leading yourself to a situation of brain toxification.”
“If you think that to remain constant is the goal of the human being and one who can do so is the person who can stand erect in great storms, then let me tell you, you are wrong. The only thing that helps you win through any battle or journey is the fact that you are ready to adapt, you are ready to listen to others, analyze the situation and mould (basically change) accordingly. And mind you everyone here is playing to win but in their own senses and their own games.”
Now, let me quickly take you to my next theory which says “Love flows like energy from one heart to another.”
Fundas of Theory 2:
“We are capable of loving more than one person at a time. We love our mom-dad, brother-sisters, uncle-aunts, grandparents and friends.”
“There is no such thing as ‘I no longer love this person.’ Of course you do. If you claim you don’t, it has just 2 meanings, one that you don’t want to accept it anymore and two that claim to hate that person because he/she didn’t paid attention to you or hurt you in the past and you are not ready to get hurt again.”
“Everyone experiences that once you feel strongly about something or someone, you begin to see things/behaviors changing for better, which is because your heart/brain is transmitting positive energy to their hearts/brains which gets reflected in the new attitude for various things or people.”
Now if you combine both the theories, we can deduce that our love keeps growing but changes with time. For ex: we have one best friend in school, another in college, another during job and life moves on. Though we love all our old friends but best/close friends keeps changing with time and sometimes we don’t even realize it.
Similarly with other relations, some of them come close at one point of time and some at other point of time. Basically, love flows like an energy from one heart to another and concentrates at different ends at different times.
Now my question to all the readers is, if change is constant and love is sublime energy flowing from one person to other, why do we want to stick to the concept of “One man woman or vice versa” or why do we want to be tied in the shackles of “I have just loved one person in my life.”
Before you raise a question, I want to clarify that I am not trying to propagate that “don’t be loyal” or “love many at a time.” I truly believe that loyalty in love brings devotion and devotion strengthens your heart making it more capable of giving and accepting.
But what I am trying to say is that when you leave your job, which you loved, you still find a new one. When you leave your friends or a place you loved, you find a new one. So when you are capable of moving on with every other thing in your life, then why not “love”? Why sulk about losing someone or why the whole concept of dipping into depth of pain and atrocity on yourself just because you lost someone. Hey guys, “Move On.”
Every society wants to do that, the whole shift from eastern to western culture is about moving on. It is not about leaving your culture or manners; it is about easing the rules of moving on. When you fight for a widow’s remarriage or when you claim that “sati” is wrong because the wife’s life does not end as soon as the husband’s life ends, then what you are fighting for is basically the right for everyone to “move on.”
And that’s my final theory- “The Move On” theory. It doesn’t asks you to stop loving those whom you did earlier, it doesn’t asks you to go through pain just because situations went against you, it doesn’t asks for your sacrifice or your partner’s sacrifice and last but not the least, it doesn’t asks you to be not loyal or not committed. It just says one thing:
“Be happy, let others be happy and in case you both are not, there’s always an option to Move On.”
Ahem Ahem!!! Look who's talking
ReplyDeleteI mean every word of it !!
ReplyDelete